Speaker Johnson’s Trump-Epstein claim has ignited controversy. House Speaker Mike Johnson faced widespread mockery on Friday, September 6, 2025, after asserting that former President Donald Trump had acted as an FBI informant in an effort to bring down convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The explosive claim, made on Capitol Hill, was an attempt to defend Trump amidst growing pressure for the full disclosure of documents related to Epstein’s federal investigation.
Johnson’s Explosive Assertion
The controversy began earlier in the week when former President Trump dismissed the bipartisan push to release all Epstein files as a “Democrat hoax.” According to reports from Asian News International, Johnson sought to clarify Trump’s remarks, stating that Trump was not downplaying Epstein’s “terrible, unspeakable evil,” but rather referring to a “hoax that the Democrats are using to try to attack him.” It was during this defense that Johnson made the unprecedented claim, “When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down.” Johnson further added that Trump “knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered these unspeakable harms.”
This assertion marks the first time an official has publicly claimed Trump was an FBI informant in the Epstein case. The claim has been met with significant skepticism and ridicule across social media and by political commentators, as reported by Yahoo News Canada. Critics have pointed out the lack of any public record or confirmation from the FBI or the White House to substantiate Johnson’s claim.
Growing Calls for Transparency
The timing of Johnson’s remarks comes as Washington continues to grapple with calls for greater transparency regarding Epstein’s network and the government’s handling of the case. Anadolu Ajansı reports that Representative Thomas Massie is leading a discharge petition to force the release of the so-called Epstein files, an effort Johnson has dismissed as “totally unfounded” and “not necessary,” aligning himself with Trump’s position against immediate full disclosure.
Internal Republican Divisions
Johnson’s stance has created a rare point of friction between Johnson and some members of his own Republican party, who, along with survivors of Epstein’s abuse, are demanding the release of all documents. This internal conflict highlights the complex political dynamics at play within the Republican party regarding the Epstein case. LiveNOW from FOX covered the growing rift, noting the increasing pressure on Johnson to reconsider his position.
The Fallout and Scrutiny
The impact of Johnson’s Trump-Epstein claim is still unfolding, but it has intensified the already contentious debate surrounding the Epstein case and Trump’s past associations. While Johnson aimed to shield Trump from criticism, the unconfirmed nature of the FBI informant claim has instead drawn further scrutiny and mockery, as highlighted by Alternet and the Hindustan Times. The Daily Express further emphasized the deep political divisions and ongoing demands for accountability in the Epstein saga.
In conclusion, Speaker Johnson’s unverified claim about Trump’s alleged role as an FBI informant in the Epstein case has backfired, drawing further scrutiny and ridicule. The controversy underscores the ongoing demands for transparency and accountability in the Epstein saga, highlighting deep political divisions and raising questions about the motivations behind Johnson’s defense of Trump. The lack of corroborating evidence from the FBI or the White House further fuels skepticism and intensifies the already complex political landscape surrounding the Epstein case.
